Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 71/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 69/100 | 25/100 | 72/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
226K
121K
Completed sessions
2,317,136
1,282,649
Token share
0.23%
0.08%
Tokens
2.8T+552%
1T+100%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.2%11K user-weeks
59.6%3.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba Mini