Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 69/100 | 25/100 | 71/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 53/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.44/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$1.32/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
121K
1.7M
Completed sessions
1,277,869
25,275,722
Token share
0.08%
6.74%
Tokens
1T+100%
81T-71%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
59.6%3.2K user-weeks
63.1%139K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba Mini