Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 90/100 | 79/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.002/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4M
1.6M
Completed sessions
106,169,667
374,481,150
Token share
38.1%
20.3%
Tokens
460T+100%
244T+208,176%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
69.3%57K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba Mini