Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 90/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.17/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4M
3.4K
Completed sessions
106,997,137
37,289
Token share
38.4%
0%
Tokens
465T+100%
276M-100%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.5·Jamba Mini