Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Kimi K2.7 Code

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp	25/100	75/100	53/100	81/100	33/100	0/100
Kimi K2.7 Code	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	33/100	63/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

DeepSeek

Moonshot

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

DeepSeek

Moonshot

Pricing

Input

$0.44/ 1M

$0.95/ 1M

Output

$1.32/ 1M

$4.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.01/ 1M

$0.19/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

232K

158K

Completed sessions

1,150,627

579,882

Token share

0.47%

0.11%

Tokens

5.7T+32%

1.3T-44%

SEP 3OCT 28

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

59.6%21K user-weeks

57.2%14K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.7 CodeDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpJamba Mini Related comparisonKimi K2.7 Code vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 CodeJamba Mini