GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash

  1. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder17/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder71/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
23K
226K
Completed sessions
62,282
2,317,136
Token share
0.01%
0.23%
Tokens
134B+100%
2.8T+552%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
61.2%11K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.